Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Billyard's avatar

Putin had better play hard ball on these negotiations after such an unnecessary atrocity. He has said himself the West is not "agreement capable" nor is it to be trusted. He should be going after an unconditional surrender. He has to make sure Ukraine remains unarmed and a DMZ.

As long as NATO exists it is a threat to Russia regardless of any agreement. It walked away from the Minsk Agreements, and moved up to Russia's after agreeing not to, and has zero integrity.

At a time when the world is escalating to greater wars Russia can show no weakness to the crazies in Washington. The bottom line is that a peace treaty is a piece of paper Washington will tear up any time it wishes to.

Until the mess in Washington is cleaned up there can be no trust and that is years in the making if ever

Expand full comment
jbnw's avatar

Pardon one more comment, but this a personal issue for me with family in and refugees from Ukraine.

Scott Ritter just posted on Twitter:

There are two main problems with the narrative Seymour Hersh’s latest source paints about Russia and Ukraine.

One is that Russia would stop fighting without liberating all of Russia’s constitutionally established territory.

Two is that Russia would allow Ukraine to join NATO.

It’s as if Hersh’s source thinks Russia lost this war.

https://x.com/realscottritter/status/1730987024893759564?s=46

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts