Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Innomen's avatar

But life prefers central authority. Evolution from single cells to animals is the process of centralization. Your cortex is a tyrant of cells. Also some threats are too immediate to debate. Even the body autonomically responds to things without even cortex input, that's a different kind of tyranny.

Also, genius is always by definition in the minority, because there is only ever one best answer. There may be close contenders but there's never a pure tie outside abstractions built to produce them. Trusting the group to run a popularity contest to indirectly find the best answer emergently is a big gamble. Correctness and popularity are not always correlated.

Also, someone is always more in charge than others. They can become experts in influence. Charisma trumps argument. I don't think democracy can actually exist. Every example is instantly corrupted.

We've had thousands of years to get it right and no society ever has. At minimum these societies failed in the militarist sense. They angered adjacent societies, failed to neutralize them be any means. Proof is in the pudding. And we no longer have time. The AI is coming in less than 9 years.

I'm just off put. Work isn't the point of life, and this stuff comes dangerously close to deifying work. This is so easy to twist. /points at "democrats"

We need to shake off the trillion dollar banking tick before we start talking about social reform for the people that control 3% of the wealth. Them not working isn't what bothers me, people should be allowed to say no to work, otherwise it's not voluntary. Them having stealth control of the entire economy and 97% of all wealth is what bothers me.

Them being "lazy" or even "parasites" isn't the issue. And glorifying work misses the point and creates an exploit, also, as I said, it's fundamentally dishonest. There's no such thing as a fair vote, ever. I dominated every group assignment I've ever been in, without even trying. And I never carried my group to disaster. /shrugs

Expand full comment
Howard McWilliam's avatar

I do not disagree with your analysis of the political economy of this situation. For instance, in the 1930s, Kalecki wrote clearly about the deliberate manipulation of unemployment by capitalists to reduce the wage-bargaining power of workers. However, I'm disappointed by the lack of compassion for the desperate working class migrants being used by neoliberal elites as a weapon against the US working class. The finger of blame in both articles, the original one and yours, is clearly pointed at the working class migrants. Without class solidarity across borders - economic social and psychological - you risk falling into the divide and conquer trap of the capitalists. The elites want the working class fighting each other so they forget who the real oppressors are and don't cooperate to resist the elites.

Expand full comment
55 more comments...

No posts